Software impacts every aspect of our lives, and enterprise software spending is expected to hit $1 trillion in 2024, which shows its growing importance in the tech world. With this rapid growth in software products, developers need the best strategies to ensure the highest quality through software testing.

That’s where we have two commonly used development approaches: Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) and Test-Driven Development (TDD). These strategies help teams choose the right project management approach. However, BDD and TDD differ in their focus, methodology, and ways of collaboration. In this article, you will comprehensively compare BDD vs. TDD to evaluate which approach is better for agile software development.

What Is Behavior Driven Development (BDD)?

Behavior-driven development is an approach in which the process starts with defining a behavior rather than writing traditional test cases. The specifications describe desired behaviors and are initially designed to fail due to missing features.

Development then progresses by adding simple code to fulfill each specification. This cycle continues until the software is ready for release.

Process of BDD

The BDD methodology consists of 7 steps, each designed to keep development focused on delivering behaviors that meet user expectations.

Discovery: The Product Owner or Product Manager defines acceptance criteria for each feature or story. Team members contribute additional criteria and confirm that all requirements are clearly understood.
Application Behavior: The application's expected behavior is described in clear, plain language. Product owners, business analysts, or QA teams often do this description and capture what the user should experience.
Formulation: Acceptance criteria are then refined into specific, detailed acceptance tests. Ambiguous terms are clarified, and scenarios are structured into clear test cases to guide development.
Translate to Automated Tests: These plain-language behavior descriptions are converted into automated test scripts. These automated tests create a foundation for verifying that the behavior aligns perfectly with the requirements.
Develop Functional Code: Developers create functional code to support the specified behaviors and make the tests pass.
Validate Behavior: Automated tests are run to confirm that the behavior has been correctly implemented. Any issues are addressed by adjusting the code until the tests pass and meet the expected behavior.
Refine Code Structure: The code is refined or organized to improve readability and reusability. It confirms maintainability as the application evolves.

Behaviour-Driven Development

What Is Test Driven Development (TDD)?

Test-driven development (TDD) is an approach where tests are created first to match specific functionalities before developing code. This allows developers to identify failures by running these tests and adjusting the code to resolve issues.

Following TDD, developers can verify that their code is reliable and fully functional. These tests allow other developers to confirm the functionality of code components they may need to use.

Process of TDD

The TDD methodology involves “writing tests before writing code.” The TDD process follows the "Red, Green, Refactor" cycle, which is repeated until the feature is entirely done.

Red: Start by writing a failed test since the feature has not yet been implemented.
Green: Write the simplest code necessary to make the test pass.
Refactor: Improve the code to increase its simplicity and maintainability.

Now, you can follow these simple steps for TDD:

Create a Test Case: Write an automated test case based on the requirements.
Execute All Test Cases: Run these test cases on the existing codebase to identify any issues.
Develop Code to Meet Test Requirements: If a test case fails, write the necessary code to authenticate it passes.
Re-run the Tests: Execute the test cases again to verify that all previously developed tests are passing.
Refactor the Code: This optional step involves refining the code to improve readability and maintainability.
Repeat for New Test Cases: Continue this cycle, creating and implementing new test cases until all requirements are addressed.

Difference between BDD vs TDD in Software Engineering

Features	Behavior-Driven Development (BDD)	Test-Driven Development (TDD)
Focus	Emphasizes application behavior from a user’s perspective	Emphasizes feature functionality and implementation
Participants	Involves developers, customers, and QA	Primarily involves developers
Process	Starts with an executable specification that fails, then adds code to achieve the required behavior	Starts with a failing test case, then adds code to pass the test and implement the feature
Main Objective	Focuses on system requirements	Focuses on unit testing
Starting Point	Start with a scenario	Start with a test case
Collaboration	Requires collaboration among all stakeholders	Requires collaboration mainly within the development team
Language	Uses plain, simple English to describe behavior/scenarios	Uses programming languages similar to those used for feature development
Best Suited For	Ideal for user-driven projects	Ideal for projects involving API integrations and third-party tools
Tools/Frameworks	vStellar Test, Cucumber, JBehave, SpecFlow, Concordian	vStellar Test, JBehave, JDave, Cucumber, SpecFlow, FitNesse

Writing Test Cases

BDD and TDD both follow different approaches to writing test cases. To understand how to write test cases in both approaches, we have given a detailed process below:

executing test cases for QA

1) Test Cases for BDD

In BDD, test cases are written as scenarios that describe how a feature should behave from the user’s perspective. Using the "Given-When-Then" format, BDD focuses on specifying desired behaviors rather than detailing technical implementation.

Each scenario starts by setting up the context (Given), then specifies an action (When), and concludes with the expected outcome (Then). Here are some example scenarios:

Feature: User Login Functionality

Scenario 1: Successful login with valid credentials

Given the user is on the login page
When the user enters a valid username and password
Then the user should be redirected to the dashboard

Scenario 2: Unsuccessful login with invalid credentials

Given the user is on the login page
When the user enters an invalid username and/or password
Then an error message should be displayed

2) Test Cases for TDD

In TDD, each test represents a specific requirement and is written to fail initially. Developers then write code to make the test pass. The cycle is simple: Write a Test, Make it Pass, Refactor. This approach checks each feature is verified, improves code quality, and reduces errors early on. For example, take these scenarios:

Scenario 1: Calculator Addition Function

Test with two positive numbers (e.g., add(2, 3) should return 5).
Test with positive and negative numbers (e.g., add(-2, 3) should return 1).
Test with two negative numbers (e.g., add(-2, -3) should return -5).
Test with zero (e.g., add(0, 5) should return 5).

Scenario 2: E-commerce Application Add to Cart Option

Test adding a product to an empty cart (e.g., addToCart(product1) should show product1 in the cart).
Test adding multiple quantities of the same product (e.g., addToCart(product1, 2) should show 2 x product1).
Test adding different products (e.g., addToCart(product2) should show product1 and product2).
Test adding a product with zero or negative quantity (e.g., addToCart(product3, -1) should return error).

BDD vs TDD Pros and Cons

BDD and TDD also differ in the benefits they offer and the challenges they bring in software development:

BDD (Behavior-Driven Development)

Pros

Focuses on collaboration and better communication between developers, testers, and non-technical stakeholders.
Uses human-readable language that’s easier for non-technical team members to understand and contribute.
Provides a clear understanding of user behavior and expected outcomes for more alignment with business goals.
Test scenarios in BDD serve as documentation for the system's behavior.

Cons

Can be time-consuming due to the need for collaboration and detailed scenario writing.
Requires everyone involved to understand and follow the BDD approach, which can be challenging for unfamiliar teams.
Sometimes, it's challenging to implement for small or highly technical projects without clear end-user interactions.
BDD tools can add complexity to the development environment.

TDD (Test-Driven Development)

Pros

Encourages writing clean, modular, and testable code by starting with tests first.
Typically, it is quicker to implement than BDD, as it focuses on the developer’s perspective without external collaboration.
Provides rapid feedback so developers can detect issues at the code level early in development.
Usually more suitable for code-heavy projects where requirements are well-understood by the development team.

Cons

Tests can be more complex and harder to maintain if the design is poorly thought out.
Limited focus on business requirements and user behavior can lead to gaps in test coverage.
Lack of readability for non-technical stakeholders, limiting collaboration outside the development team.
Can be rigid, as it often focuses more on "how" than "what" or "why," while missing the bigger picture of user needs.

BDD and TDD QA Testing Software

vStellar Test is a comprehensive testing framework that increases software development efficiency by supporting both Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) and Test-Driven Development (TDD) methodologies. In vStellar Test, you can write a test case by following the Gherkin syntax, which is easy for technical and non-technical users to understand. Here’s how vStellar Test works:

Support for BDD: vStellar Test allows users to write tests in plain language using Gherkin syntax. This promotes clear communication among team members and helps product owners, developers, and testers collaborate effectively.
Support for TDD: vStellar Test's TDD capabilities enable developers to write unit tests before the actual code is developed. This approach helps in code quality, as tests are a safety net for refactoring. vStellar Test's TDD features allow for quick feedback loops, helping developers identify issues early in the development cycle.

test automation framework

Why vStellar Test Is Your Partner in Advanced Testing with BDD and TDD

Choosing the right testing approach can make a big difference in software development and create a powerful testing strategy. BDD focuses on user-focused features, while TDD focuses on code quality. Developers can deliver high-quality software that meets both user expectations and technical standards.

vStellar Test is your ultimate partner in advanced testing and executing test cases with either BDD or TDD, whichever suits you best. Its powerful support for both Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) and Test-Driven Development (TDD) provides the tools you need to deliver high-quality software efficiently. You can confidently incorporate these methodologies to drive innovation and excellence in your development process.

Take the first step towards software quality excellence. Contact vStellar Test today, and let’s get started.

FAQs

1) How Do Stakeholders Benefit From BDD?

BDD benefits stakeholders through improved communication and understanding of requirements, as tests are written in plain language. This makes it easier for non-technical team members to contribute to discussions.

2) Can BDD and TDD Be Integrated Within vStellar Test’s Development Process?

vStellar Test adopts a hybrid approach that uses behavior-driven development (BDD) for high-level behavior definitions and test-driven development (TDD) to implement specific functionalities, maximizing the advantages of both methodologies for project success.

3) Can BDD and TDD be Used Together?

Yes, BDD and TDD can be used together. Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) defines application behavior from the user's perspective, while Test-Driven Development (TDD) focuses on writing tests before coding.

Introduction to BDD vs TDD in Software Testing

Related Blogs

Validation Testing in Software Testing: Steps & Techniques

No Code Spy Locator Management for Smarter QA Testing

End to End Testing: Purpose, Process & Best Practices

News Letter

Weekly Testing Newsletter Testing News & Tips

You Are One Click Away From Automated QA!